Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Blue Carbon Discussed

A Blue Carbon session was held at the National Council for Science and the Environment's “Our Changing Oceans” meeting last week in Washing D.C. (Jan. 19-21).

The session focused on our current range of potential approaches to sequester carbon in the oceans, i.e. the blue carbon approach and ocean fertilization. Issues discussed included the need for comprehensive research (including the role of science funding agencies), what a potential blue carbon market would look like, governance issues in the coasts and open oceans, readily available policy opportunities, and how to tackle greater policy targets.

The blue carbon panelists included Steven Lutz (myself), Director of Blue Climate Solutions, Linwood Pendleton, Director of Ocean and Coastal Policy, Nicholas Institute, and Steve Crooks, Climate Change Director, ESA PWA.

Ocean fertilization panelists included Ken Buesseler (co-chair), Senior Scientist, Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Dept. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Fei Chai, Professor of Oceanography School of Marine Sciences and Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, and Chris Vivian, Cefas, UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

A list of recommendations was requested from the conference organizers, here is what we came up with:

Task 1. Recognize the importance of coastal and ocean carbon sequestration in climate change discussions (e.g. Governments, IPCC, COP)

Task 2. Regarding coastal and ocean carbon sequestration policy and research, we need to identify cabinet level leadership (e.g. establish an SOST working group, include in White House CEQ guidelines, and include in National Ocean Policy)

Task 3. To encourage coordinated US federal research and policy regarding coastal and ocean carbon sequestration, we need to identify who’s in charge at the agency level and their roles (e.g., DOE, DOI, NSF, NASA, NOAA, USGS, EPA etc.)

Task 4. Fund and develop comprehensive ocean carbon science programs that examine the fate of carbon from watersheds to the open ocean.

Task 5. While we recognize the need for research on coastal and ocean carbon sequestration we should take immediate action to conserve ecosystems that are already known to sequester carbon.

Blue Carbon at the Executive Level - on Friday, one of the questions posed by a member of the audience to Dr. John Holdren, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, asked about views on ocean fertilization. The question was framed in a context with blue carbon.

Dr. Holdren’s answer drew clear distinction between blue carbon and ocean fertilization. He included mention of seagrasses and mangroves (as potential natural carbon sinks) and referred to ocean fertilization as “fiddling with the oceans.” The video of his comments should be available on the Our Changing Oceans web site later this week.

BCS flyer for the Our Changing Oceans meeting. 

For the Our Changing Oceans on the web see:

For the Breakout Session, Blue Carbon: Carbon Sequestration in the Marine Environment, including many blue carbon references (click on articles), see:

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Carbon Sequestration as a Marine Ecosystem Service

Very neat conceptual diagram illustrating marine ecosystem services. Seagrass and mangrove carbon sequestration included.

The image was included in a recent policy brief issued by Conservation International - People and Oceans, managing marine areas for human well being (CI, 2011, 19 pp), and is available at:

Bottom Trawling and Blue Carbon

Just last month the fisheries minister of Belize announced that all forms of trawling will be banned in Belize effective December 31, 2010.

Oceana worked with the government in facilitating the buyout of the existing two trawlers owned and operated by the Northern Fishermen Cooperative Association (NFC). Additional pressure came from UNESCO, which threatened to take the Belize Barrier Reef System off its World Heritage Site list.

My though on this - if the dragging of the nets by the two NFC boats was damaging the seagrass meadows, and thereby impacting the carbon sequestration function of this ecosystem, then...

Could the buyout of bottom trawlers be funded by a blue carbon market or fund?

See also:

Belize Bans Bottom Trawling in Exclusive Economic Zone (Dec. 8, 2010)

Belize totally bans bottom trawling

Impacts of Bottom Trawling on Fisheries, Tourism, and the Marine Environment (image courtesy Oceana)

U.S. ecosystem carbon storage methodology (including coastal waters)

Interest from DOI and USGS in the carbon storage carbon function of U.S. ecosystems, including "wetlands," "estuaries," and "coastal waters."

Full report available at:

New method measures carbon storage potential and reduces greenhouse gas

Dec. 17, 2010

A new methodology to assess the potential to store carbon in U.S. wetlands, forests and rangelands ecosystems — and thus to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere — will help find ways to mitigate the impacts of climate change, the Department of the Interior announced.

“This new research by scientists from Interior’s U.S. Geological Survey is a cutting-edge development that will inform land management policies and planning for the long-term storage of carbon to help lessen the impacts of climate change,” Deputy Secretary of the Interior David J. Hayes said. “This innovative initiative, which Congress called on Interior to undertake in 2007 energy legislation and which Secretary Salazar outlined at the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, will improve the nation's understanding of amounts, sources, and transport of carbon at scales suitable for use by land managers and decision makers.”

National assessment

“Using this methodology, the USGS will now be able to conduct a national assessment to determine how much carbon is being stored in ecosystems and to estimate the capability to use natural systems – such as wetlands, forests and rangelands – to absorb greenhouse gases. The assessment will be conducted on a regional basis,” said USGS scientist Zhiliang Zhu.

The process of removing carbon from the atmosphere and storing it in vegetation, soils and aquatic environments is known as biological carbon sequestration. The movement of greenhouse gases in ecosystems results from natural ecosystem processes and human activities. This assessment accounts for three gases, which are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).

As part of the national assessment, USGS scientists are evaluating major processes that affect carbon sequestration capability and greenhouse gas emissions. Those processes include climate change, changes in land use and land cover, changes in land management activities, and ecosystem disturbances such as wildfires.

This methodology incorporates public comments that were solicited on a draft methodology published in July 2010. It also builds upon the USGS rapid assessment report published in December 2009 to estimate the carbon storage potential in the nation’s forests and soils. The new methodology focuses on all of the nation’s ecosystems and incorporates data and methods (including land use and biogeochemical models and aquatic models) that were updated since the rapid assessment was published. This methodology also incorporates suggestions from an interagency science panel, an extensive peer-review process and comments from other federal agencies.

In addition, the USGS is conducting research on a number of other fronts related to carbon sequestration. These efforts include evaluating the potential for storing carbon dioxide in geologic formations below Earth’s surface, potential release of greenhouse gases from Arctic soils and permafrost, and mapping the distribution of rocks suitable for potential mineral sequestration efforts.

The methodology was developed in accordance with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which directed the Department of the Interior to develop the methodology and conduct the national assessment. This research also benefited from discussions with a variety of organizations and stakeholders, such as the Department of Agriculture (particularly the U.S. Forest Service) and Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency and the science community.

For more information about this assessment methodology, visit

Monday, January 24, 2011

"Blue carbon" initiatives emerging as promising carbon sinks

"Blue carbon" initiatives emerging as promising carbon sinks

By Suzanne Bohan, Contra Costa Times, Posted: 01/23/2011

Robin Miller winced as she stuck her hand into the frigid waters of an experimental Delta wetland to probe the soft soil below.

"I found it," the U.S. Geological Survey scientist called out, pulling from the muck a small packet filled with rotting plants called "proto-peat." In time, that plant matter becomes peat, the rich soil formed by decayed plants that makes the Delta such productive farmland.

Though farmers have long prized peatland, scientists are also according it new respect given its impressive carbon gas storage capabilities. An emerging "blue carbon" initiative, shorthand for capturing and storing carbon dioxide in coastal and ocean environments, places wetland restoration among its centerpiece endeavors to reduce heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere.

"This is probably the highest sequestration of carbon dioxide you can get in a biological system," said Stephen Crooks, a San Francisco wetland restoration expert.

At the United Nations climate summit in Cancun, Mexico, late last year, Crooks sat on a panel on blue carbon.

He has been closely monitoring the 10-year USGS study of carbon sequestration on Twitchell Island in the Delta, which is showing some of the best evidence on wetlands' ability to efficiently capture carbon.

"This is the foremost example of showing how you can restore wetlands and sequester carbon at the same time," Crooks said. "We can use what has been learned as a very firm reference to help inform policy development in the U.S. and overseas."

Crooks and other scientists are using Twitchell Island project findings and other data to support the inclusion of wetland restoration and preservation in California's emerging carbon-trading market, set to open in 2012. They also see a role for it in established carbon markets overseas, such as those in the European Union. Carbon markets create financial incentives for reducing heat-trapping gases and have yielded $144 billion in trading worldwide in 2009, according to "States and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010."

State and federal science agencies point to the accumulation of greenhouse gases released by human activity as the main reason for gradually rising average temperatures and sea levels worldwide. According to NASA, 2010 tied with 2005 as the warmest year on record. Intense efforts are under way to reduce such emissions and to remove excess carbon from the atmosphere.

If wetland restoration and preservation enters the carbon market, it could yield substantial resources for wetland restoration projects worldwide, experts say, which has benefits beyond carbon capture.

"I'm very excited about it and I think it has great potential," said Samuel Schuchat, executive officer of the California Coastal Conservancy, a state agency that enhances coastal resources and access. His agency gave $50,000 in seed money last year to establish a national protocol for including wetland restoration in carbon markets.

California has a lengthy list of unfunded wetland restoration projects, which can run from $6,000 to $60,000 per acre.

Schuchat's agency is part of a multiagency drive to restore 50,000 acres of tidal wetlands in the Bay Area, and the agencies hope to acquire 50,000 acres more.

Restoring tidal wetlands provides a "three-fer" in benefits, Schuchat said. These lands, he said, sequester carbon dioxide and keep pace with rising seas by accumulating more underwater plant mass as water rises.

In the Delta, wetland restoration also strengthens the weakening 19th-century levees, which hold back the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers. Wetlands build up peat, which reverses the land subsidence -- from peat loss due to farming -- that puts greater water pressure on the levees. Over the past century, land in the Delta has sunk by 20 feet in some areas. If farming continues there, the USGS's Miller said, the land could sink another 20 feet. Delta levees are vulnerable to collapse during earthquakes, and widespread failure would leave millions of people without drinking water and cut off irrigation water for thousands of acres of farmland south of the Delta.

Wetlands are habitat for birds and juvenile fish, and are essential for maintaining healthy fisheries, said Steve Emmett-Mattox, a director with Restore America's Estuaries, which is also working to move wetlands into carbon markets. Wetlands protect coastal communities from severe storms and floods, and millions of people enjoy their recreational opportunities, such as hunting, fishing, boating and birding.

Wetlands restoration is "a massive win, basically," Emmett-Mattox said.

"Offsets" are among the incentives offered in carbon markets. Offsets encompass environmental projects, such as reforestation, which sequesters carbon in growing trees, or methane emissions control from operations such as farms or landfills.

An industrial plant complying with mandatory emissions caps can purchase carbon offsets in lieu of reducing its own emissions. The net result is still a reduction in greenhouse gases.

In California, a new carbon cap-trade law takes effect Jan. 1, 2012, requiring 600 major industrial plants in the state to limit their greenhouse gas emissions. It creates the country's only carbon market, and the law aims by 2020 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 15 percent, to 1990 levels.

Up to 8 percent of industry reductions can come from purchasing offsets.

Demand is strong for a greater variety of offsets, said Gary Gero, president of the Climate Action Reserve.

Industrial plants affected by the new law "are concerned that there may not be a sufficient supply of offsets," Gero said. "Or that if there are sufficient supplies, it will be tight or it could be expensive.

"So they, as a general matter, prefer as many offsets as possible," he said.

One of the challenges of restoring wetlands for greenhouse gas sequestration is that freshwater tidal wetlands can release significant amounts of methane, 25 times as potent a greenhouse gas as carbon dioxide.

But peat wetlands generally accumulate so much carbon dioxide that they have a significant net benefit, Crooks said.

Saltwater marshes are also excellent carbon sinks, said Scott Bridgham, a scientist with the University of Oregon who has extensively studied carbon stores in wetlands. They don't have the problem of methane emissions, because salt water inhibits its production, he said.

Bridgham isn't gung-ho about moving ahead quickly with wetland restoration in carbon markets until there's knowledge on which wetlands best sequester carbon.

"I have been a little bit of a naysayer in this," he said.

Though he said he enthusiastically supports wetland restoration because of its benefits, Bridgham is concerned that if wetland restoration enters the carbon market with inadequate data behind it, scientists could later learn that some wetlands are releasing enough methane to erase the carbon benefit.

"The data behind it has to support it," Bridgham said. "Or we're going to end up with egg on our face, and it will give a negative impression about wetland restoration."

One of the most significant findings of the Twitchell Island project was how quickly a tidal wetland rebuilds peat. Each year, the test wetland adds 1 to 2 inches of peat, the USGS's Miller said.

Studies there showed that the rate of carbon sequestration was robust enough that a net of up to 15 tons of carbon dioxide per acre per year accumulates in managed freshwater wetlands, even after accounting for the methane release, Crooks said.

This month, however, state funding was cut entirely for the Twitchell Island wetland project, Miller said.

Though the pioneering Twitchell Island project's future suddenly is uncertain, the Environmental Defense Fund this year plans to embark on a large-scale wetland restoration -- at least 200 acres -- in the Delta to get more of the hard data that carbon trading markets require, said Brenda Morris, a Sacramento-based regional director with the fund.

This month, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also began to study carbon sequestration in a large North Carolina wetland. And at the climate talks in Cancun last year, a scientific advisory group asked a U.N. climate change panel to research wetlands' carbon-capturing potential.

"The idea is spreading," said Crooks, who also co-leads an international panel on blue carbon, funded in part by NASA.

"There aren't enough offsets to go around," he said. "And there could be potentially big benefits for conservation by bringing wetlands into the carbon markets."